<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron 17-50mm compare to Canon 17-55mm IS USM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radiantlite.com/2008/07/tamron-17-50mm-compare-to-canon-17.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2008/07/tamron-17-50mm-compare-to-canon-17.html</link>
	<description>Digital photography guide, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:08:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SciPhinx</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2008/07/tamron-17-50mm-compare-to-canon-17.html/comment-page-1#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>SciPhinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=125#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>Hi
Thanx for a pretty good review. just wanted to point out that Tamrons rating in image quality seems a little of shouldnt it be &quot;very good&quot; by your scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Thanx for a pretty good review. just wanted to point out that Tamrons rating in image quality seems a little of shouldnt it be &#8220;very good&#8221; by your scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended lenses for Canon 40D and 50D</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2008/07/tamron-17-50mm-compare-to-canon-17.html/comment-page-1#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended lenses for Canon 40D and 50D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=125#comment-565</guid>
		<description>[...] This lens is the best standard zoom for crop sensor cameras, ideal for general walk-around and awesome in low light because it has f/2.8 constant aperture and image stabilization. Unfortunately, the built quality is not like professional quality lenses. [Review] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This lens is the best standard zoom for crop sensor cameras, ideal for general walk-around and awesome in low light because it has f/2.8 constant aperture and image stabilization. Unfortunately, the built quality is not like professional quality lenses. [Review] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

