Monday, October 6, 2008

Nikon D90 vs Nikon D80

Nikon D90 has shocked the DSLR for photography enthusiast this year with many new features such as movie recording ability, auto sensor cleaning, 50% faster continuous burst, better iso and 2 extra megapixel.

But it is worth it for users to upgrade from Nikon D80? Or for first time buyer, is it better to buy D80 and save some money rather to buy D90? And are there any other options outside of Nikon?

It is back to the users if they value the enchantment provided by D90.
Some improvement will make photographer life a lot easier, but some other does not significantly help the job. Let say 2 megapixel increase is not significant.

Here are some improvement on D90:
  • 2 extra megapixel
  • 1 stop extra iso up to 6400
  • 3" LCD with higher resolution
  • Live view and movie recording capability
  • Faster continuous burst from 3 fps to 4.5 fps
  • Option to buy kit lens with VR 18-105mm
Same:
  • 11 points autofocus points
  • Same body construction and similar buttons placement
Improvement on ISO and VR lens will help new photographers better in low light condition. Live view mode will help on macro and precise focusing, and movie recording will be a nice extra features for recording casual events, artistic project or even recording a new flash for web.

Read More...
But movie recording capability is not perfect. Taking movie by hand will result on shaky movie. In addition to that, there is no auto focus. But the nice thing about this feature is the ability to use different kind of lens to get various exciting effects, such as shallow depth of field and ultra wide effect.

Users who are only focusing on taking artistic and casual photography might not use many of the improvement. Thus, Nikon D80 will provide enough features. Also, the price of D80 now is very affordable. The price differences are up to $500.

But if you are photographers that interested to expand to another medium such as video, and will do many low light assignments or action photography, D90 is a better well-rounded camera for those purposes. I can imagine that you will use this camera for a long run.

Another camera to consider is Canon 40D, which has the same price point as D90 and features better body/handling and faster continuous burst (6.5fps) but no movie recording and lower iso sensitivities (3200). These features make 40D is better suited for sport/action photography.

Related Stories: Nikon D90 vs Canon 40D

Labels:

2 Comments:

Blogger Rene Grothmann said...

I am currently using a D70. I love its long battery time, the master mode for the internal flash, the AE flash lock, the focus catch etc. It is these details which make the camera valuable for me. Some details on the D70 I would like to see improved. I would like to have a a site comparing all these fine things instead of the broad picture you thankfully gave here. In the end, I might have to read the manuals.

October 7, 2008 11:31 PM  
Blogger Enche Tjin said...

Thanks for your comment, In this site, I like to give some big picture to the readers. To get finer details about the cameras, it is best to see the manual as you suggested.

Nevertheless, I will try to give some more details as time progress.

October 11, 2008 4:26 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home