<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html</link>
	<description>Digital photography guide, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:08:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luxembourg</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-5468</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxembourg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-5468</guid>
		<description>This is small lens. That&#039;s its main claim to fame, not the speed at f2.8, nor the focal length, the equivalent of about 35mm in 35mm photography. But on the small Olympus PEN body, this lens gives you a small package that takes quite good pictures without messing around with a zoom. In particular, it works well as a walking-around street camera, much like an old Leica or a Canon rangefinder of the 1950s/1960s. (See also the optical viewfinder which has image lines specifically for this 17mm lens.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is small lens. That&#8217;s its main claim to fame, not the speed at f2.8, nor the focal length, the equivalent of about 35mm in 35mm photography. But on the small Olympus PEN body, this lens gives you a small package that takes quite good pictures without messing around with a zoom. In particular, it works well as a walking-around street camera, much like an old Leica or a Canon rangefinder of the 1950s/1960s. (See also the optical viewfinder which has image lines specifically for this 17mm lens.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tjin. For me the stabilisation in body of EP-2 outweight the Panasonic when used prime 20/1.7 as well as legacy lenses, which in fact I am using must of the time. Still such comatibility will allow me to retain my other Lumix lenses which are quite good, especially 45-200. regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tjin. For me the stabilisation in body of EP-2 outweight the Panasonic when used prime 20/1.7 as well as legacy lenses, which in fact I am using must of the time. Still such comatibility will allow me to retain my other Lumix lenses which are quite good, especially 45-200. regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enche Tjin</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>Enche Tjin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>yes there are. For full compatibility list check out: http://panasonic.jp/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes there are. For full compatibility list check out: <a href="http://panasonic.jp/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://panasonic.jp/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>It is still not clear to me if the panasonic lenses sauch as 20/1.7, 14-45 and 45-200 can be used with EP-1/2 retaining all their functions as; autofocus, appeture control, all programs, image stabilisation, namely are they fullu compatible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still not clear to me if the panasonic lenses sauch as 20/1.7, 14-45 and 45-200 can be used with EP-1/2 retaining all their functions as; autofocus, appeture control, all programs, image stabilisation, namely are they fullu compatible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moondog</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Moondog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>The E-P2 will offer an external mic via an optional mic-jack that supposedly attaches via the flash mount (which doubles as an accessory mount). I don&#039;t think the E-P1 can use this device unfortunately. :-(

One major advantage of the E-P1&#039;s in-body optical image stabilization vs. the Panasonic&#039;s in-lens stabilization, is that when you use a vintage manual lenses (via a M4/3 adapter) and they too will have stabilization!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E-P2 will offer an external mic via an optional mic-jack that supposedly attaches via the flash mount (which doubles as an accessory mount). I don&#8217;t think the E-P1 can use this device unfortunately. <img src='http://www.radiantlite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One major advantage of the E-P1&#8217;s in-body optical image stabilization vs. the Panasonic&#8217;s in-lens stabilization, is that when you use a vintage manual lenses (via a M4/3 adapter) and they too will have stabilization!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Most popular posts in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Most popular posts in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 &#8211; Duel of ultra compact m43 camera [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 &#8211; Duel of ultra compact m43 camera [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Guide: which m43 Panasonic Camera?</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Guide: which m43 Panasonic Camera?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricoh GRX vs Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricoh GRX vs Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>[...] Recommended read: Ricoh GRX pro and cons &#124; Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recommended read: Ricoh GRX pro and cons | Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympus E-P2 specs, news and picture</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympus E-P2 specs, news and picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympus E-P2 pictures and rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympus E-P2 pictures and rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] [Read: Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Read: Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

