<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html</link>
	<description>Beginner guide to digital photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:57:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moondog</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Moondog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>The E-P2 will offer an external mic via an optional mic-jack that supposedly attaches via the flash mount (which doubles as an accessory mount). I don&#039;t think the E-P1 can use this device unfortunately. :-(

One major advantage of the E-P1&#039;s in-body optical image stabilization vs. the Panasonic&#039;s in-lens stabilization, is that when you use a vintage manual lenses (via a M4/3 adapter) and they too will have stabilization!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E-P2 will offer an external mic via an optional mic-jack that supposedly attaches via the flash mount (which doubles as an accessory mount). I don&#8217;t think the E-P1 can use this device unfortunately. <img src='http://www.radiantlite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One major advantage of the E-P1&#8217;s in-body optical image stabilization vs. the Panasonic&#8217;s in-lens stabilization, is that when you use a vintage manual lenses (via a M4/3 adapter) and they too will have stabilization!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Most popular posts in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Most popular posts in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 &#8211; Duel of ultra compact m43 camera [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 &#8211; Duel of ultra compact m43 camera [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Guide: which m43 Panasonic Camera?</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Guide: which m43 Panasonic Camera?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricoh GRX vs Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricoh GRX vs Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>[...] Recommended read: Ricoh GRX pro and cons &#124; Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recommended read: Ricoh GRX pro and cons | Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic GF1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympus E-P2 specs, news and picture</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympus E-P2 specs, news and picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympus E-P2 pictures and rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympus E-P2 pictures and rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] [Read: Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Read: Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus E-P1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panasonic GF1 vs Canon G11</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Panasonic GF1 vs Canon G11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-888</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus PEN E-P1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 vs Olympus PEN E-P1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panasonic GF1 got glowing review from two major review sites</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Panasonic GF1 got glowing review from two major review sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-839</guid>
		<description>[...] Olympus E-P1 is the main competitor of Panasonic GF1. I discussed the differences here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Olympus E-P1 is the main competitor of Panasonic GF1. I discussed the differences here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slaven</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Slaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Re AVCHD: GF1 offers _both_, AVCHD and motion JPEG (as an option in the menu) so if you&#039;re scared of using one there&#039;s always the option for the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re AVCHD: GF1 offers _both_, AVCHD and motion JPEG (as an option in the menu) so if you&#8217;re scared of using one there&#8217;s always the option for the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/09/olympus-e-p1-vs-panasonic-gf1.html/comment-page-1#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiantlite.com/?p=1072#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Jack, the E-P1 does not nave a mic in jack.  If you want mic in jacks, and want to stick to a hybrid camera platform, you go for either a panasonic GH1 or a pentax k7.    

avchd is only a &quot;pain&quot; to edit if your computer is ill-equipped to handle the compression, so how much of a pain it truly is is dependent on how modern your processor and vid processor is.  

If you have much interest in maintaining characteristics of large apertures (shallow DoF, available-light photography) across your focal lengths (f/2.0 or brighter) Access to Oly&#039;s legacy lenses is a pretty significant factor in favor of e-p1, since they have several pro-grade (and weather-sealed) lenses that get you f/2.0+ qualities from focal lengths between 14mm though 200mm.  Those are significant assets available *today* whereas with panny you are currently significantly hamstrung.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, the E-P1 does not nave a mic in jack.  If you want mic in jacks, and want to stick to a hybrid camera platform, you go for either a panasonic GH1 or a pentax k7.    </p>
<p>avchd is only a &#8220;pain&#8221; to edit if your computer is ill-equipped to handle the compression, so how much of a pain it truly is is dependent on how modern your processor and vid processor is.  </p>
<p>If you have much interest in maintaining characteristics of large apertures (shallow DoF, available-light photography) across your focal lengths (f/2.0 or brighter) Access to Oly&#8217;s legacy lenses is a pretty significant factor in favor of e-p1, since they have several pro-grade (and weather-sealed) lenses that get you f/2.0+ qualities from focal lengths between 14mm though 200mm.  Those are significant assets available *today* whereas with panny you are currently significantly hamstrung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
