Comments on: Nikon D700s, D700x or D800 ???

By: Yes

Yes — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:21:04 +0000

For 5 years, I’m waiting for a 24mp D700x as a landscape photographer. Still using a D300…

By: hagai

hagai — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:40:30 +0000

I’m waiting for the next camera after the D700.
If Nikon did not improve much the video capability, I pass canon 5D

By: Richard

Richard — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:23:43 +0000

I’ll by a 700s of whatever 800x/y/z when it will have:
- All the nice features of the 700 PLUS:
- Same high ISO quality as D3s
- Real HD video (i.e. 1080, not limited in time of sequences)
- Slightly higher resolution, but not necessarily 24 Mpix. 15 to 18 may be good enough, as long as noise gets even better than 700 and frame rate of at least 7 fps. This is kind of a struggle against the basic laws of physics, and I could remain satisfied with the current resolution of 12 Mpix, but I doubt Nikon would release a brand new body with the same resolution. Laws of physics get definitely a lower priority than the laws of marketing.
- Same price as actual 700, a few months after introduction.

By: mbaDad

mbaDad — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:09:01 +0000

I need a balanced camera, and 12MP is so restricting. Our P&S is 14MP. I vote for the last paragraph, Full Frame, 16-18mp, moderate speed, HD video.

By: Andre

Andre — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:33:55 +0000

Ditto Rodney – High ISO is more important to me than megapixels. I hope for a D700s with the same improvements to ISO that happened in D3s over D3…

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:12:26 +0000

I just want a D700s 12mp that can shoot 12,800 like the D3s for the price of a D700…